Transformations in international development finance:
debates and tensions from an International Political Economy perspective in the post-2008 global crisis
Keywords:
international political economy, development finance, financialization, international financial architecture, sustainability.Abstract
The 2008 global financial crisis constitutes a turning point in international development finance, associated with changes in the International Financial Architecture (IFA) and in the mechanisms through which resources are provided to developing countries. From an International Political Economy (IPE) perspective, this article analyzes transformations in the instruments, actors and institutions involved in development finance in the post-crisis period. The discussion draws on debates within the field regarding the relationship between power, markets and institutions (Cohen, 2008; 2022), as well as contributions that examine these dynamics from a Latin American perspective (Tussie, 2015). Within this framework, the article examines the expansion of the financialization of development and the reconfiguration of the role of international financial institutions, particularly through the concept of the Wall Street Consensus (Gabor, 2021). It also addresses the implications of international agendas related to sustainability, energy transition and climate change (Cadman and Sarker, 2022), together with tensions associated with extractivist patterns of international insertion in Latin America (Acosta, 2020). The article argues that these transformations remain embedded within existing structures of the IFA and tend to reproduce asymmetries in the international system.
Downloads
References
Chin, G. & Gallagher, K. (2019). Coordinated Credit Spaces: The Globalization of Chinese Development Finance. Development and Change, 50(1), 245-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12470
Cohen, B. J. (2008). International political economy: An intellectual history. Princeton University Press.
Cohen, B. J. (2022). Rethinking international political economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gabor, D. (2021). The Wall Street consensus. Development and Change, 52(3), 429-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12645
Molinari, A. & Patrucchi L. (2020). Rompiendo el molde: logros y desafíos de los nuevos bancos de desarrollo. Revista Ciclos en la Historia, la Economía y la Sociedad, (54), 131-155. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/145663
Molinari, A. & Patrucchi, L. (2022). Limitantes financieros y mandato contracíclico: manifestaciones recientes en los bancos multilaterales de desarrollo. Revista Ciclos en la Historia, la Economía y la Sociedad, (58), 193-220. https://doi.org/10.56503/CICLOS/Nro.58(2022)pp.193-220
Rey, H. (2015). ‘Dilemma not Trilemma: The Global Financial Cycle and Monetary Policy Independence’. NBER Working Paper (21162). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Tussie, D. (2015). Relaciones Internacionales y Economía Política Internacional: notas para el debate. Relaciones Internacionales, (48). 155-175.
Wang, H. (2017). New Multilateral Development Banks: Opportunities and Challenges for Global Governance. Global Policy, 8(1), 113-118. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.12396
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Irene Sacco

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may separately enter into additional arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it may lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and higher citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).













